Many programmers choose React for building web solutions because it’s simple, flexible, and efficient. In particular, this library allows developers to create a web product using reusable UI components. It not only accelerates the development process but also makes web applications easy to maintain and update. In addition, a component-centric approach helps to create a consistent look and feel across the whole web application, even if it’s quite large.
Another React’s “killer feature” is a virtual DOM (Document Object Model). It distinguishes a difference between the previous and current HTML to update only what was changed, not the entire tree structure of HTML tags. Great developer tools, active community, and Facebook parentage may also be valid reasons to choose React for the web development project.
By the way, the library has an enviable list of Silicon Valley users. Besides Facebook, it is used by PayPal, Netflix, IMDb, and Airbnb. So if market leaders’ experience is important to you, opting for React will be a wise decision.
For instance, Angular uses two-way data binding. Due to it, changing view triggers changes in a model state and vice versa. It’s much easier to work with than one-way binding applied by React. In addition, Angular is based on Type-Script, a superset of JS, that is more lightweight and compact. Type-Script also allows for easy detection of typos so it takes less time to test and debug software.
If compared to React, the biggest Angular drawback is that it operates on real DOM. Since the entire HTML doc is rewritten when some changes are made, the performance of large web applications with high image saturation may be compromised. At the same time, Angular uses fewer dependencies than React which makes it a perfect JS framework for enterprise development.
But Vue also has a few disadvantages. It doesn’t have all “fancy” features of React and Angular. Its community is much smaller and there is still a significant shortage of talent. Vue isn’t always a great choice for large or rapidly growing projects since it’s not stable enough (i.e. no financial support from tech giants like Facebook or Google). Besides, the over-flexibility of this library may create room for battles of different programming approaches within a development team.
Another benefit of this framework that helps to reduce time to market is the Ember Inspector. It allows programmers to quickly inspect Ember objects, streamlining both the development and debugging processes.
On the flip side, Ember offers rather limited flexibility. That’s why it isn’t a good fit for projects requiring a unique structure that differs from the one offered by the framework. It is also a bit slow in rendering so you need to understand this before making a decision. Neither Ember has ever had a wide network of developers — this may become a problem for long-term and growth-oriented projects.
- size of the project
- type of the envisioned web app
- other specifics of a product
- budget constraints
In particular, if you need to develop an enterprise web solution, then Angular will probably be the best option. React is more flexible so you should pick it if you’re ready to make a lot of architectural decisions yourself. Out of all top JS frameworks, Vue is the easiest to learn. That’s why it will suit those people who are looking for a simple and lightweight solution. Ember is great for web products that must be developed quickly but this speed comes at the cost of the framework rigidity.
The bottom line
Get in Touch
Send us a message and we’ll get back to you shortly